温馨提示:本站仅提供公开网络链接索引服务,不存储、不篡改任何第三方内容,所有内容版权归原作者所有
AI智能索引来源:http://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2026/04/17/judicial-ethics-opinion-25-162/
点击访问原文链接

Judicial Ethics Opinion 25-162 | Law.com

CompassRadarVerdictSearchScholarChina Law & PracticeSearchAsk a QuestionLaw.com CompassLaw.com RadarVerdict SearchScholar .China Law & PracticeLegal DictionarySearchAsk a QuestionLaw.com CompassLaw.com RadarVerdict SearchScholar .China Law & PracticeLegal DictionaryAll WorldUKAsia PacificEuropeLatin AmericaMiddle East & AfricaNorth AmericaGeneral CounselInnovationLaw Firm HiringLaw Firm ManagementLaw Firm Office Launches and ClosuresAll TopicsRankings & ReportsBriefingsAll Legal TechnologyAlternative Dispute ResolutionArtificial IntelligenceContractsCybersecuritye-DiscoveryIntellectual PropertyKnowledge ManagementLegal OperationsPrivacyAll TopicsThe Artificial Intelligence GlossaryData Privacy Law TrackerGenerative AI Case StudiesLegal Tech Deal TrackerLegal Tech Investment TrackerMeet the Female Founders of Legal TechKEY CONTENTLegaltech News Reporting, and expert analysis of legal technology with a focus onwhat legal departments, law firms, and tech companies need to knowAll Surveys & RankingsAm Law 100Am Law 200A-ListGlobal 200NLJ 500Pro Bono ScorecardAll Market HubsAtlantaBostonLos AngelesSt. LouisTorontoRankingThe Am Law 100 Rankings The Am Law 100 is the definitive ranking of the 100 largest law firms in the United States.ToolLaw.com Compass Dynamically explore and compare data on law firms, companies, individual lawyers, and industry trends.ToolLaw.com Radar Real-time alerts on new state and federal litigation, plus unlimited complaint access, expert case summaries and AI-enhanced trend detection.ProPro Mid-MarketGlobal Leaders in LawPrivate Client Global EliteNew YorkPennsylvaniaAll ResourcesAnalyst ReportsCLE CenterEditorial CalendarExpert PerspectivesExpert Witness SearchIndustry PodcastsIndustry WebcastsLaw Journal NewslettersLawJobsLawyer PagesLegal DictionaryLexology IndexPodcastsProfessional AnnouncementsResource CenterScholarScholar StoreWebcastsherehereLearn moreLog in here[email protected]www.copyright.com.[email protected].Asset & Logo LicensingSDNY Judge: Brooklyn Attorney's 'Outrageously Unprofessional' Conduct Included Deposition Disruptions, AI-Hallucination CitationsPart-Time Judge Who Owns and Runs Company Must Choose Between Judicial Office and Company’s Political Activity: Judicial Ethics Opinion 25-195Judge Precluded From Advisory Committee for Sexual Assault Survivor Stigma Study Over Partiality Concerns: Judicial Ethics Opinion 25-194Judge Allowed to Author Legal Treatise Chapter, but Former Firm’s Assistance Triggers Two-Year Recusal From Firm’s Cases: Judicial Ethics Opinion 25-193Part-Time Judge’s Firm Precluded From Suits Against Appearing DA or Police: Judicial Ethics Opinion 25-192For YouMembershipLaw.com ProThe membership program designed for the legal industry professional who is focused on delivering revenue and profit growthWilliam Watt Joins Maggs McDermott & DiCicco as Associate AttorneyNew Jersey Law JournalGlaser Weil Lands Former Federal Prosecutor and Top Real Estate Partner in Strategic ExpansionThe RecorderBD&J Welcomes Dana Alden Fox to Firm's New Pasadena OfficeThe RecorderUSWorldBusiness of LawPractice of LawCorporate LegalLegal TechnologyRankingsEventsResourcesExpert Witness SearchGlobal Leaders in LawLaw Journal NewslettersLaw.com CompassLaw.com Mid-MarketLaw.com ProLaw.com RadarLegal DictionaryLexology IndexPrivate Client Global EliteVerdictSearchCLE CenterLaw.com ScholarLaw JobsBest ofAsset & Logo LicensingLegal PerspectiveLawyer PagesEditorial CalendarProfessional AnnouncementsAboutContact UsSitemapAdvertiseThe American LawyerCorporate CounselNational Law JournalNew Jersey Law JournalThe Legal IntelligencerThe RecorderConnecticut Law TribuneDaily Business ReviewNew York Law JournalDaily ReportDelaware Business Court InsiderLegaltech NewsTexas LawyerSupreme Court BriefLitigation DailyTerms & ConditionsPrivacy PolicyDo Not Share or Sell My Personal Information

Judicial Ethics Opinion 25-162 | Law.com,AI智能索引,全网链接索引,智能导航,网页索引

    Once a surrogate becomes aware that he/she has personal extra-judicial knowledge of an apparently material fact that was omitted from the petition in an uncontested probate proceeding, the surrogate must disqualify from the matter. The surrogate may not take any further action in the proceeding.